Sorry for digging this up, just got bit hard by this behaviour and I'm 
wondering what the rationale was for not defining `identical?` as 
`keyword-identical?` currently is, and instead adding an additional 
`fast-identical?`.

This way Clojure/ClojureScript code using `identical?` remains portable without 
breaking, and `fast-identical?` could be used internally and by folks familiar 
with the platform-specific ramifications.

Or am I missing a subtlety here?

Thanks a lot, cheers! :-)

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to