Could you give an example, please?
— Sent from Mailbox On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Gary Trakhman <[email protected]> wrote: > It's helpful in the sense that you can wrap standard arrays and JS objects > to work with CLJS protocols without globally affecting your whole app. > That may or may not be 'easier', but it's potentially simpler. > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Yehonathan Sharvit <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Could you please elaborate about how 'specify' is helpful in the angular + >> cljs context? >> >> On Sunday, 19 October 2014 23:50:10 UTC+3, Gary Trakhman wrote: >> > Now cljs supports 'specify' so it'll be a bit easier to work with >> angular than when Kevin wrote his original blog post. >> > >> > >> > http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJS-414 >> > >> > >> > >> > I tried to build something with CLJS/Angular before Om was a thing, and >> I found it hard to keep track of what kind of data I was passing around, >> and to reconcile immutable ops with mutable JS data structures. >> > >> > >> > No longer worth it, imo. >> > >> > >> > Haven't tried gyr. >> > >> > >> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Kevin Lynagh <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Sunday, October 19, 2014 2:28:52 AM UTC-7, Yehonathan Sharvit wrote: >> > >> > > Hello, >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I am pushing very strong clojurescript in my company. >> > >> > > Currently we use cljs + angular. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I am curious to know how many people use this stack and do you have >> any recommendation? >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks. >> > >> > >> > >> > My company has worked on several projects using cljs + Angular. >> > >> > I wrote a blog post last year outlining some of it: >> > >> > >> > >> > http://keminglabs.com/blog/angular-cljs-weather-app/ >> > >> > >> > >> > The decision was a pragmatic one at the time, but in the most few months >> we've been doing new work using React/Om, which feels much nicer to use >> from ClojureScript than Angular does. >> > >> > >> > >> > I recall in particular the cljs<->js datatype coercion got tricky in >> places and it was easy to trip over. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> > >> > --- >> > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "ClojureScript" group. >> > >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >> an email to [email protected]. >> > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >> >> -- >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ClojureScript" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >> > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google > Groups "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojurescript/bHTskfjsyjA/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
