David Mohl: I agree with Daniel's response. At first, you were trying to keep a component directly in the application state. This strikes me as odd and probably a bad idea. I say this for three reasons:
1. Intuition (not a persuasive argument, I admit) 2. Om needs components to nest in each other, not in app state. (Though I don't see why this *could not* work *somehow*, it does seem to be sketchy. 3. It is better to keep your app-state as small as possible. Why store a generated component when all you need to do is store a path or route? -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
