Does cljs.test support asynchronous tests? What are benefits of cljs.test over 
clojurescript.test (https://github.com/cemerick/clojurescript.test)? 
Clojurescript.test also a port of clojure.test but has additional API for 
writing asynchronous tests.  

On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 2:39:22 PM UTC-8, Shaun LeBron wrote:
> really exciting stuff, thanks a lot
> 
> On Wednesday, December 17, 2014 3:54:09 PM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
> > ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source code.
> > 
> > README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
> > 
> > New release version: 0.0-2496
> > 
> > Leiningen dependency information:
> > 
> >     [org.clojure/clojurescript "0.0-2496"]
> > 
> > The big change in this release is a port of the clojure.test namespace
> > - cljs.test.
> > It is largely compatible with clojure.test and implements enough
> > functionality such
> > that we could port all of the existing tests to it. It's also featureful 
> > enough
> > to support a ClojureScript port of test.check that is underway.
> > cljs.test is compatible
> > with all of the optimization settings provided by the compiler including 
> > :none.
> > 
> > Still cljs.test may not satisfy all the patterns that people have come to 
> > expect
> > from clojure.test so feedback (and enhancement/fix patches) is very welcome.
> > 
> > On the way we implemented changes to the compiler in order to make
> > custom testing
> > frameworks simpler to implement - this includes compiler support for
> > :test metadata as well
> > as introducing static vars.
> > 
> > ClojureScript does not have vars, however there are var patterns that
> > are largely
> > static in nature and useful for metaprogramming and REPL interactions. 
> > Towards
> > this end we've implemented the `var` special form and introduced very 
> > restricted
> > functionality - metadata is the primary use case.
> > 
> > (defn foo [])
> > (meta #'foo) ;; will return the expected metadata
> > 
> > cljs.test is implemented on top of this functionality as well as a new 
> > namespace
> > cljs.analyzer.api which I think macro writers will find quite useful.
> > 
> > Also there's a doc macro now in the cljs.repl namespace that works as 
> > expected.
> > Patches welcome to bring all the useful bits of clojure.repl into cljs.repl.
> > 
> > ## 0.0-2496
> > 
> > ### Enhancements
> > * cljs.test added, mirrors clojure.test
> > * New cljs.analyzer.api namespace for easier access to analysis info from 
> > macros
> > * New cljs.analyzer.api namespace for easier access to analysis info from 
> > macros
> > * Support :test metadata on vars
> > * Support static vars
> > * cljs.source-map for client side source mapping
> > * expose ClojureScript :warnings build option
> > * CLJS-909: Add stable api for consumers of compiler data.
> > 
> > ### Changes
> > * convert all ClojureScript tests to cljs.test
> > * add volatile! from Clojure 1.7
> > * stateful transducers use volatile!
> > * added `js-debugger` macro, compiles to "debugger;"
> > * CLJS-892: Improve performance of compare-symbols/compare-keywords
> > * CLJS-696: remove arguments usage from defrecord constructor
> > * unroll `partial`, copy & pasted from Clojure core.clj
> > * optimize clojure.string/join
> > 
> > ### Fixes
> > * fix `cljs.nodejs/enable-util-print!`, incorrectly monkey patched
> > `cjls.core/string-print` instead of setting `cljs.core/*print-fn*`
> > * cljs.reader bug, '/ incorrectly read
> > * avoid emitting the same goog.require

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to