Am Samstag, 20. Dezember 2014 12:03:51 UTC+1 schrieb Arnaud Bailly:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Sven Richter <[email protected]> 
> wrote:Hi Arnaud, 
> 
> I had a good time with the chestnut template: 
> https://github.com/plexus/chestnut
> 
> 
> thanks a lot for the pointer sven, will definitely have a look at it and get 
> some inspiration from it. Cannot use it asis because I do not use clojure as 
> backend.

There is no need, just take the cljs related things from it. It basically does 
what was suggested here already.
Using optimizations :none for development and injecting some extra html code 
for this mode.

> I don't know about tests, but thats a different topic I guess.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You don't write tests for your clojurescript? You use the REPL to interact 
> with the application until satisfied? Or work in the debugger? 

Disclaimer: I use clj / cljs only for my private projects and learning.
And yes, I did not write cljs tests yet. I don't say one does not need cljs 
tests, however, setting this up and using phantomjs seemed to much of a burden 
for me for fun projects.
Of course, if something goes into production I strongly advise to have tests 
for it, which you obviously seem to follow anyway.

However I recently started using cljx in one of my projects and was pleased to 
find that I can unit test them like clojure code, which I did in some cases.



Best Regards,
Sven


Am Samstag, 20. Dezember 2014 12:03:51 UTC+1 schrieb Arnaud Bailly:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Sven Richter <[email protected]> 
> wrote:Hi Arnaud, 
> 
> I had a good time with the chestnut template: 
> https://github.com/plexus/chestnut
> 
> 
> thanks a lot for the pointer sven, will definitely have a look at it and get 
> some inspiration from it. Cannot use it asis because I do not use clojure as 
> backend.
>  
> 
> It is no magic bullet, but generates a leiningen project with front and 
> backend with some sane defaults for development and production.
> 
> I don't know about tests, but thats a different topic I guess.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You don't write tests for your clojurescript? You use the REPL to interact 
> with the application until satisfied? Or work in the debugger? 
> 
> 
> I have been test-infected for several years now so developing a piece of code 
> without first writing a test is really something painful to me. But I can 
> understand people are productive and efficient doing otherwise, and would 
> like to know better. Might be related to my lack of (recent) experience and 
> interest with front-end dev...
>  
>  
> 
> 
> Another  player in the boat might be the build tool boot. I have not tried it 
> yet, but it seems like it does provide good defaults too for dev / production 
> environments.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yes. A friend of mine also pointed me at this on the french ML.
> 
> 
> Regard,
> Arnaud 

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to