I have played with the tutorial provided here: 
http://keeds.github.io/clojurescript/2014/12/19/cljs-test.html

It seems that new tests inside an existing namespace are not run when using 
lein cljsbuild auto test.

Is it a bug in cljs.test?



On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 20:40:03 UTC+2, David Nolen  wrote:
> Time between releases are pretty variable though they tend to be
> pretty frequent around new features like cljs.test as issues need to
> be ironed out.
> 
> I'll probably cut another release on Friday.
> 
> David
> 
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Yehonathan Sharvit <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Great news David!
> >
> > What is the usual delay (in days) between commit to the master and release?
> >
> > On Wednesday, 24 December 2014 20:18:39 UTC+2, David Nolen  wrote:
> >> The `are` macro isn't in a current release, however it's in master and
> >> will appear in the next one. Otherwise Russell's assessment is
> >> correct.
> >>
> >> David
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Yehonathan Sharvit <[email protected]> 
> >> wrote:
> >> > What about the 'are' macro?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 7:38 PM, Russell Mull <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Things that aren't in cljs.test:
> >> >>
> >> >> with-test
> >> >> run-tests can take a custom environment parameter. Things that required
> >> >> rebinding a var in clj.test are configured with an entry in the 
> >> >> environment.
> >> >>
> >> >> :reporter, instead of rebinding the report function
> >> >> :testing-contexts instead of *testing-contexts*
> >> >> :testing-vars instead of *testing-vars*
> >> >>
> >> >> And that's it. It looks like a nearly complete port.
> >> >>
> >> >> - Russell
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Tuesday, December 23, 2014 1:59:45 PM UTC-8, Yehonathan Sharvit 
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> What is the gap between clojure.test and cljs.test?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> For exmaple: is the `are` macro implemented in cljs.test?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Wednesday, 17 December 2014 23:54:09 UTC+2, David Nolen  wrote:
> >> >>> > ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source 
> >> >>> > code.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > New release version: 0.0-2496
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Leiningen dependency information:
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >     [org.clojure/clojurescript "0.0-2496"]
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > The big change in this release is a port of the clojure.test 
> >> >>> > namespace
> >> >>> > - cljs.test.
> >> >>> > It is largely compatible with clojure.test and implements enough
> >> >>> > functionality such
> >> >>> > that we could port all of the existing tests to it. It's also
> >> >>> > featureful enough
> >> >>> > to support a ClojureScript port of test.check that is underway.
> >> >>> > cljs.test is compatible
> >> >>> > with all of the optimization settings provided by the compiler
> >> >>> > including :none.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Still cljs.test may not satisfy all the patterns that people have 
> >> >>> > come
> >> >>> > to expect
> >> >>> > from clojure.test so feedback (and enhancement/fix patches) is very
> >> >>> > welcome.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On the way we implemented changes to the compiler in order to make
> >> >>> > custom testing
> >> >>> > frameworks simpler to implement - this includes compiler support for
> >> >>> > :test metadata as well
> >> >>> > as introducing static vars.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > ClojureScript does not have vars, however there are var patterns that
> >> >>> > are largely
> >> >>> > static in nature and useful for metaprogramming and REPL 
> >> >>> > interactions.
> >> >>> > Towards
> >> >>> > this end we've implemented the `var` special form and introduced very
> >> >>> > restricted
> >> >>> > functionality - metadata is the primary use case.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > (defn foo [])
> >> >>> > (meta #'foo) ;; will return the expected metadata
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > cljs.test is implemented on top of this functionality as well as a 
> >> >>> > new
> >> >>> > namespace
> >> >>> > cljs.analyzer.api which I think macro writers will find quite useful.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Also there's a doc macro now in the cljs.repl namespace that works as
> >> >>> > expected.
> >> >>> > Patches welcome to bring all the useful bits of clojure.repl into
> >> >>> > cljs.repl.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > ## 0.0-2496
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > ### Enhancements
> >> >>> > * cljs.test added, mirrors clojure.test
> >> >>> > * New cljs.analyzer.api namespace for easier access to analysis info
> >> >>> > from macros
> >> >>> > * New cljs.analyzer.api namespace for easier access to analysis info
> >> >>> > from macros
> >> >>> > * Support :test metadata on vars
> >> >>> > * Support static vars
> >> >>> > * cljs.source-map for client side source mapping
> >> >>> > * expose ClojureScript :warnings build option
> >> >>> > * CLJS-909: Add stable api for consumers of compiler data.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > ### Changes
> >> >>> > * convert all ClojureScript tests to cljs.test
> >> >>> > * add volatile! from Clojure 1.7
> >> >>> > * stateful transducers use volatile!
> >> >>> > * added `js-debugger` macro, compiles to "debugger;"
> >> >>> > * CLJS-892: Improve performance of compare-symbols/compare-keywords
> >> >>> > * CLJS-696: remove arguments usage from defrecord constructor
> >> >>> > * unroll `partial`, copy & pasted from Clojure core.clj
> >> >>> > * optimize clojure.string/join
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > ### Fixes
> >> >>> > * fix `cljs.nodejs/enable-util-print!`, incorrectly monkey patched
> >> >>> > `cjls.core/string-print` instead of setting `cljs.core/*print-fn*`
> >> >>> > * cljs.reader bug, '/ incorrectly read
> >> >>> > * avoid emitting the same goog.require
> >> >>>
> >> >> --
> >> >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> >> >> your first post.
> >> >> ---
> >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> >> >> Google Groups "ClojureScript" group.
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> >> >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojurescript/gnCl0CySSk8/unsubscribe.
> >> >> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> >> >> [email protected].
> >> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> >> > your
> >> > first post.
> >> > ---
> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> > "ClojureScript" group.
> >> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> >> > email to [email protected].
> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
> >
> > --
> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
> > your first post.
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "ClojureScript" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected].
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to