ES6 could potentially make the generated cljs code shorter as ES6 now supports destructuring and arrow functions. Generators could also make core.async generate less, and more performant, code.
However, ES6 wouldn't bring anything new to the table as far as I know, and since clojurescript still plans to support browsers at least down to IE8, I don't really think ES6 is worth investigating at the moment, since we have to be able to compile IE8-compliant code anyway and, like I said, we can't really do anything with ES6 that we can't already do with ES5. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
