My really short answer is that it's far easier to reason about non-trivial apps in CLJS than in JS.
Jamie On Jan 13, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Hello Funk <[email protected]> wrote: > Developers generally prefer a language that minimizes its inner > inconsistencies. JS is certainly not a language that is easy to love > considering its many bizarre behaviors and non-intuitive phenomena. > > One good set of examples: http://wtfjs.com/about > > Clojurescript and other languages that compile to JS bring a higher level of > order to a language that is relatively messy. > > I believe, as has been said many times, that JS is like the assembly language > of the 21st century. But who wants to write in assembly? It's a fair analogy. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
