Will do and ask more questions...

I'd like to approach it from the point of view of someone interested in
both SPA and re-usable components that can be shared with Reagent, Om and
other FRP-like ClojureScript SPA implementations

The idea is if we can build SPAs any way we like (e.g. re-frame, vanilla
Reagent/Secretary, Om+?, etc) but be able to share components amongst us
that will help ClojureScript in the long run ....

80% of the web uses jQuery plugins (I heard that on HN, no reference, so it
may be wrong but I think it's probably close) and no SPA framework can
claim that. I was thinking that if we have a re-usable component standard
then each SPA framework will figure out a way to work with such components,
but in defining that standard we have to understand all the different SPA
architectures that are likely to succeed

... and you guys are saying re-frame is likely to succeed, so it's high up
on my list, with my interest centering around how it would work with
reusable components

when I asked Mike T said it's an SPA framework not a reusable component
architecture but i think the two should work together .. He did also say
that they're working on reusable components

So with that said, I look forward to understanding how we can, as a
community of developers all speaking speaking the same language
(clojurescript),  get to discussing standards that will help us share units
of functionality rather than build A for framework ABC and build A again
for framework XYZ

Does that make sense?

Marc


On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Mike Haney <[email protected]> wrote:

> Read the whole README for re-frame and it will all make more sense.
>
> I don't think reactions are pub/sub - usually those are implemented using
> atom watches.  The event dispatch mechanism, however, is like pub/sub.  I
> noticed the library uses core.async, so they very well may be using
> core.async pub/sub, although I haven't dug into the library code yet so I
> might be wrong.
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to