On March 10, 2015 at 11:31:29 AM, Marc Fawzi (marc.fa...@gmail.com(mailto:marc.fa...@gmail.com)) wrote: > I understand the practical futility of my call to have a standard for > reusable components that allows us as users to carry our investment forward > to the next great framework. But expressing it allows me to think a little > deeper about the possible solution.
My hunch is that once adoption gets a little wider, "Web Components" will be the standard under which reusable across framework components appear. Because that standard will have browsers direct support and will not be specific to any one language etc., it will likely have an order or two of magnitude more components available than anything specific to React or CLJS etc. So the answer will be: if you want access to a pool of reusable components, make sure that your framework can both make and consume web components in a reasonably idiomatic and convenient way. -- Kyle Cordes http://kylecordes.com -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
