On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 12:58:14 PM UTC+1, Mike Thompson wrote: > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 at 9:18:16 PM UTC+11, Colin Yates wrote: > > Not to go too far down the 'communicate with local state' tangent, but > > isn't a global event-bus (eg. a (chan)) sufficient? I use om and > > app-state for all state (except projections) and haven't found any of > > the given scenarios a challenge. > > > A global event bus is certainly a popular solution when you have distributed > state and control, and you want the parts coordinated. > > PureMVC and many other OO frameworks take this approach. Sounds like some > have taken this approach with OM too when coordinating components. It > certainly works! > > With re-frame I tried to not have that problem in the first place (so then I > didn't need a solution for it). > > -- > Mike
Not sure I agree that re-frame escapes the distributed state and control parts better than other discussed approaches, but I think we've scared the OP enough already :) I believe the consensus for the original question is that re-frame is great for large applications. So go and create! While we may continue bickering over the details in another thread :) -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
