Ok, putting it on hold, and reading again next week. Till then if anyone has any thoughts on how it compares to Flux type architectures at the 10,000 foot level, please feel free to enlighten.
Thank youooo On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Marc Fawzi <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm reading this now: https://github.com/Day8/re-frame > > (so far 30% done with the main Readme) and it appears to be a basic > pattern(s) and reference implementation for using Reagent in line with the > React Flux architecture. true, false or maybe? > > I initially resisted the idea because it dumps cursors which I believe all > or most ClojureScript React "frameworks" support. I was concerned that > doing so means that components can never be written to be portable across > ClojureScript UI frameworks that use React and depend on some cursor > implementation, but that's a lost cause or less important than having one > framework that does what you want and for which reusable components can be > developed. > > After having played around with raw Reagent I found that I can get myself > in trouble in so many ways, and I'm hoping re-frame will be the kind of > opinionated framework that will isolate us from the "crazy" in "reactive" > > So is re-frame basically, at the 10,000 foot level, an implementation of > the React Flux architecture for Reagent or should I keep reading? > > Thank you > > Marc > > > > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
