My bias comes from having worked in Rails for so long. There is no perfect way. Frankly, after reading the discussion with you and Mike, I can see why organizing by page would be better in some situations.
On Mar 26, 2015, at 11:24 AM, Colin Yates <[email protected]> wrote: > Ah, the good old 'package by component or technology' debate... I tend > to fall on the component side, simply because I think it scales better > and is how I think of the app, but I can see the merits of both sides. > > On 26 March 2015 at 15:19, Marc Fawzi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Jamie, >> >> That makes sense unless you build out your site based on micro services >> (which coordinate among themselves) and then have "micro apps" on the front >> end (each consisting of 1-4 pages and mapped to individual features of your >> app) that don't need to share state/data. In that case, you'd want to >> arrange under app name and each would have its own repo. >> >> But in that case, I think re-frame might be too much abstraction for the >> amount of code you're having to deal with (less than 400 lines per app) ... >> At some small scale the abstraction becomes noise. >> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:00 AM, Jamie Orchard-Hays <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Coming from the Rails world as I do, I'd invert that: >>> >>> handlers/page01.cljs >>> subscriptions/page01.cljs >>> views/page01.cljs >>> >>> etc. >>> >>> Jamie >>> >>> On Mar 26, 2015, at 3:32 AM, Colin Yates <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> How would you structure this for an SPA with multiple top-level >>>> 'pages'? I am thinking: >>>> >>>> - common (the usual bootstrapping crud) >>>> - page1/[handlers,subs,views etc.] >>>> - page2/[handlers,subs,views etc.] >>>> ... >>>> >>>> The central db would be in common/state.clj which each page, during >>>> 'bootstrap' would update with a default state and schema. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 26 March 2015 at 01:52, Mike Thompson <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 1:07:56 AM UTC+11, Colin Yates wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> What is the recommended approach? Cloning the example project, the >>>>>> re-frame-template (which is still using re-frame 0.1.8) or sticking it >>>>>> together by hand? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We do have the mandatory lein template in the wings. Will be released >>>>> very shortly, I hope. >>>>> >>>>> In the meantime, look at the structure of the todomvc example. >>>>> https://github.com/Day8/re-frame/tree/master/examples/todomvc >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>>>> your first post. >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "ClojureScript" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>>> your first post. >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "ClojureScript" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >>> >>> -- >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "ClojureScript" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >> >> >> -- >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ClojureScript" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
