We should start a club for people who will be kicking themselves :) On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 at 17:07 Dillon Forrest <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Colin, as a crazy coincidence, I'm trying to accomplish something very > similar. I started wondering if I should set a session uuid server-side, > but I'm sure there's a more elegant solution out of the box. Also expecting > to kick myself once I know the correct way to do it. :) > > On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 4:52:44 AM UTC-4, Colin Yates wrote: > > I did try that but then I can't find where to access that in the > messages received from a client. I know I am going to kick myself... > > > > On Friday, 27 March 2015 00:54:46 UTC, Wei Hsu wrote: > > > If you want each client to be unique, what if your user-id-fn could > just generated a UUID? > > > > > > On Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 9:19:11 AM UTC-7, Daniel Kersten wrote: > > > > I actually would like to do the same thing. For authentication, I > would use a JSON Web Token and would happily pass that with my requests > manually. I don't care if client id's change because my server is > stateless-REST-like. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 at 15:22 Colin Yates <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I have read the documentation but I think I am having a bad day as I > just can't get it to click. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Essentially I would like each new 'client' to be uniquely identified > where: > > > > > > > > - a new client is created for every 'client-less' request (e.g. a > new tab) - each subsequent request is then associated with that client > > > > > > > > - server restarts can happily drop all existing clients and they > can become new clients > > > > > > > > - authentication is handled elsewhere > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can't use the ring's session-id as it is shared by every tab. I > notice a 'client-id' which appears to be unique across tabs but the FAQ > implies that 'client' is the wrong granularity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am sure I am being a numpty, but what do I need to do. Is a > user-id-fn of :client-id sufficient? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient > with your first post. > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "ClojureScript" group. > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, > send an email to [email protected]. > > > > > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > > > > > > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
