https <https://github.com/rymndhng/entangle>:// <https://github.com/rymndhng/entangle>github.com <https://github.com/rymndhng/entangle>/ <https://github.com/rymndhng/entangle>rymndhng <https://github.com/rymndhng/entangle>/entangle <https://github.com/rymndhng/entangle>
Its a little messy and undocumented at the moment. I am implement Neil Fraser's Differential Sync algorithm (somewhat like constantly doing 'git rebase') using watches and core.async. the best use case would be for syncing blobs of text like in google docs. There's still a lot of kinks to work out, but its been a lot of fun to play with clojure abstractions and libraries. On Fri, May 8, 2015, 5:53 PM Frozenlock <[email protected]> wrote: > @marc: Yes, it was intended. Of course, there's a little 'gap' between > quantum and atom scale... ;-) > > @Raymond: Got a Github project ready? I'd be lying if I told I didn't > envision this as the next logical step; keeping atoms on the server in sync > with those on the client. The communication part is the place where I have > the less experience, so I'd very much like use yours. > > My naive vision was something like this: Database <--> > abstraction-layer (atomize?) <-> atom <-------- INTERNET ---------> atom > <-> abstraction-layer (entanglement?) <-> Reagent > > While 'entanglement' could create an atom from another atom, 'atomize' > could create atom from nothing else than functions. > > > On Thursday, May 7, 2015 at 7:53:42 PM UTC-4, Raymond Huang wrote: > >> Wow! I'm literally hacking on a little project called `entangle` ;) which >> keeps remote atoms in sync using websockets, core.async. >> >> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:16 PM Marc Fawzi <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Thank you for coming back to this ... I got busy in between the time I >>> naively engaged you on that thread and have not had the chance to dig into >>> what you were proposing but now Clojure and related concepts are far less >>> foreign to me and I'll certainly be reading your proposed change and >>> discussing it with the current maintainers in the Reagent org as well as >>> Dan himself (hopefully! I know he just answered a whole bunch of issues) >>> >>> btw, I love the connotation with quantum entanglement (if that was >>> intentional) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Frozenlock <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> You might be interested in a quick look at: >>>> https://github.com/Frozenlock/entanglement >>>> >>>> I wrote it after working on reagent-cursors and seeing a pattern emerge. >>>> >>>> The main purpose is to have an abstraction layer between the data and >>>> the application (IE Reagent). >>>> This way you can decouple how Reagent is written and how your data is >>>> stored in an atom. >>>> >>>> (Related Reagent issue: >>>> https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent/issues/92) >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 7:47:02 PM UTC-4, marc fawzi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> So after a couple of months drooling over ClojureScript's more >>>>> advanced facilities, I've finally managed to play with Protocols and >>>>> Records. >>>>> >>>>> It feels a bit OO-ish me, but can't see how I could survive without >>>>> it.... >>>>> >>>>> Is this really functional programming or did I subconsciously revert >>>>> to OO? >>>>> >>>>> PowerCursors >>> >>>>> >>>>> https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/0090a95b6b4f9c12c070 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The previous version was a weaker abstraction which used multi-methods >>>>> (https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/2b3aa1594ce707227b96) and is very >>>>> amateur in retrospect so I'm hoping the next version will be that much >>>>> better... >>>>> >>>>> This one doesn't even >>>>> >>>>> If you have any feedback for this n00b please don't hesitate to share >>>>> here. >>>>> >>>>> Btw, all of this digging and exploring because of one comment at our >>>>> last SF Reagent meetup that cursors were just simple pointers. The latest >>>>> abstraction doesn't even use any cursor per se but invents it's own simple >>>>> yet more robust lensing pattern. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you for all your help answering my often ridiculous questions. >>>>> >>>>> Marc >>>>> p.s. the last meetup's video IS coming this Thursday, and it will put >>>>> all of this "Cursors can do it all, depending on how you define them" in >>>>> context.. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Reagent-Project" group. >>>> >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>> >>> >>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reagent-project. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "ClojureScript" group. >>> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to [email protected]. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> >> >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >>> >> -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
