On Saturday, June 13, 2015 at 9:00:25 PM UTC+10, Andreas Liljeqvist wrote: > I couldn't find any place to discuss it on the relevant github. > > > Can anyone explain to me why dispatch, subscribe, register-handler and > register-sub all use a vector as an argument? > > > Like this: > (dispatch [:remove-item 25]) > vs > (dispatch :remove-item 25) > > > > same for subscribe: > (subscribe [:items]) > > vs > (subscribe :items) > > > I think the vector-less version seems more idiomatic? > Similarities to assoc and such. > > > (I love re-frame, asking about design decisions is a good way to learn)
Events should be captured/represented as a single piece of data - a vector or map are the most obvious choices. The former was chosen. When the data is captured this way it becomes easy to log, convey, etc. Processing functions have a known arity, etc. Everything is a lot easier. -- Mike -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
