Coukd you please post the code that produces that warning? Ideally a minimal case.
On Thursday, 3 September 2015, Scott Nelson <[email protected]> wrote: > Why is this bad practice? I'm trying to extend a protocol to js/Function > and I get the following warning: > > WARNING: Extending an existing JavaScript type - use a different symbol > name instead of js/Function > > I'm trying to create a function that is polymorphic based on the input > type (could be a function, map or vector) and I thought protocols were the > best way to do that. Should I instead create a multimethod that dispatches > on (type arg)? > > Thanks! > > -Scott > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:;>. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > <javascript:;>. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
