Christian, On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Christian Weilbach < [email protected]> wrote:
> > into and pipe should probably be safe. I was thinking of a case where a function is returning the equivalent of: (async/onto-chan ... [1 2 (Exception.)]) And the consumer wants to async/into [], obscuring the error from <?. It looks like you've defined <<? as an alternative. I have some distantly related code here: https://github.com/nervous-systems/glossop/blob/master/src/glossop/util.cljc - keyed-merge (when used with a/into {}) is a slightly different approach to <!* Can you find constructs/cases I am missing? > I haven't taken everything in, though I think it'd be great if your channel operations were usable outside of the context of a supervisor, so pieces of the approach could be considered/adopted without going all-in. Take care, Moe -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
