Well the title gives that impression and I regret having chose to do that :) 

But if you read the content i am asking the question if Async functions in es7 
can be used to build a performant and faithful version of CSP (github: 
aysnc-csp) and also be useful for common tasks like the simple server request 
scenario I mentioned then why wouldnt we want to think of CSP as just one 
pattern not the One True Pattern for async. Right now core.async is being used 
and or recommended for everything async and I am asking if that is ideal and if 
CLJS can allow itself to grow beyond this one particular pattern when it comes 
to async. The first thing would be renaming core.async to core.csp and 
promoting choice when it comes to async patterns. As it is right now, every 
time someone has an async design problem core.async is recommended as a 
solution regardless of whether or not it's the best fit solution. If you have a 
hammer...

That's the scope. Not es7 vs core.async and I'm sorry for the stupid title.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 15, 2015, at 8:32 AM, Johann Bestowrous <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> At a high level, I think it's pretty important to note that you are comparing 
> a language spec to a library.
> 
> -- 
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to