Sure, it's definitely possible, and once you have a working config it's very solid. However I think that a dedicated REPL type will be more robust, particularly when it comes time to upgrade Figwheel or some other part of the chain. The initial setup is clearly difficult and fragile right now, as is keeping it working through upgrades.
On 12 October 2015 at 21:41, Tord Romstad <tord.roms...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 9:29:18 AM UTC+2, Adam Kowalski wrote: > > Colin that sounds fantastic, can you elaborate more on your plans? So if > you will bypass the nREPL are you going to somehow connect directly to the > figwheel REPL? > > > > I have setup a basic cursive environment with intellij and already as it > is today it seems pretty sophisticated. I really like the autocompletion > without being connected to the REPL > > I think Colin and Bruce are both too pessimistic about running Figwheel > through nREPL in Cursive. As long as you use piggieback 0.1.5, I've found > the setup to be rock solid and very pleasant to use. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
