Can someone explain why it's necessary to manually add a dependency on
clojurescript in the :plugins vector?
:plugins [[lein-figwheel "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"]
[org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"]] ;; Overrides broken
lein-figwheel dependency.
Shouldn't the version of ClojureScript specified in :dependencies always be
used?
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:18 AM Andreas Liljeqvist <[email protected]> wrote:
> Works without problem with boot-cljs.
> Roughly 20% decrease in compilation time.
>
> Great work.
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:24 PM Francis Avila <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Debug dependency problems with `lein deps :plugin-tree` and `:tree`.
>> These show you what your actual dependencies are and why.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Nov 9, 2015, at 12:15 PM, David Nolen <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> It appears one of your dependencies is pulling in an older version of
>> Clojure.
>>
>> David
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:03 AM, David Petrovics <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Francis,
>>>
>>> I tried figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT, got the (No such var: ana/forms-seq*)
>>> exception, then added [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"] to the plugins
>>> and am now seeing:
>>>
>>> java.io.FileNotFoundException: Could not locate
>>> cljs/analyzer__init.class or cljs/analyzer.clj on classpath: ,
>>> compiling:(figwheel_sidecar/utils.clj:1:1)
>>>
>>> I'm on [lein-cljsbuild "1.1.1"], [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"],
>>> [org.clojure/clojure "1.7.0"], [org.omcljs/om
>>> "0.8.8"], [lein-figwheel "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"]
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 5:44:03 AM UTC-5, Francis Avila wrote:
>>> > For future travelers.
>>> >
>>> > If you use figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT you will get this exception:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > clojure.lang.Compiler$CompilerException: java.lang.RuntimeException:
>>> No such var: ana/forms-seq*, compiling:(figwheel_sidecar/utils.clj:49:21)
>>> >
>>> > figwheel 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT has a dependency on cljs 1.7.145 even though
>>> it needs 1.7.170.
>>> >
>>> > To resolve this error you must explicitly depend on clojurescript in
>>> your plugins. Example:
>>> >
>>> > :plugins [[lein-figwheel "0.5.0-SNAPSHOT"]
>>> > [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"]] ;; Overrides broken
>>> lein-figwheel dependency.
>>> >
>>> > lein deps :tree shows cljs 1.7.170 is used.
>>> >
>>> > So,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 3:30:05 AM UTC-6, Maria Geller wrote:
>>> > > Try using 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT for figwheel ;)
>>> > >
>>> > > On Saturday, November 7, 2015 at 9:59:24 PM UTC+13, Francis Avila
>>> wrote:I'm getting the following exception with figwheel builds (using
>>> 0.4.1):
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > java.lang.AbstractMethodError: Method
>>> clojurescript_build/core/CompilableSourcePaths._find_sources(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object;
>>> is abstract
>>> > >
>>> > > at clojurescript_build.core.CompilableSourcePaths._find_sources
>>> (core.clj:-1)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > (cljsbuild works fine with version 1.1.1)
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > Nolan said "All the mentioned tools [inc. figwheel] have already
>>> accounted for this change." I don't see any mention in the figwheel docs
>>> about cljs 1.7.170 compatibility or any commit message that mentions it.
>>> Can anyone confirm this is actually true for figwheel?
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > On Friday, November 6, 2015 at 6:05:19 AM UTC-6, David Nolen wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > ClojureScript, the Clojure compiler that emits JavaScript source
>>> code.
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > README and source code: https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > Leiningen dependency information:
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > [org.clojure/clojurescript "1.7.170"]
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > This release includes a major refactor of the build pipeline
>>> thanks to
>>> > >
>>> > > > Juho Teperi. This change along with some greatly simplified
>>> > >
>>> > > > recompilation logic will mean much faster cold build times for
>>> larger
>>> > >
>>> > > > projects (some users have already reported >10X).
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > This is a breaking change for existing tooling. You will need to
>>> > >
>>> > > > upgrade lein-cljsbuild, lein-figwheel, and boot-cljs if you intend
>>> to
>>> > >
>>> > > > adopt this version of ClojureScript. All the mentioned tools have
>>> > >
>>> > > > already accounted for this change. Refer to the appropriate
>>> > >
>>> > > > documentation for your tooling to determine which version number
>>> you
>>> > >
>>> > > > should adopt.
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > Other interesting changes and fixes include newer Google Closure
>>> > >
>>> > > > Compiler and Library dependencies, self hosting tweaks, a Google
>>> > >
>>> > > > Closure modules (:modules compiler option) regression,
>>> > >
>>> > > > improved warnings, and minor REPL enhancements.
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > As always feedback welcome!
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > ### Enhancements
>>> > >
>>> > > > * Refactor build pipeline
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1478: Self-host: Allow static-fns opt
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > ### Changes
>>> > >
>>> > > > * Generate larger range of random UUIDs
>>> > >
>>> > > > * make browser REPL file reloads less chatty
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1475: indicate that cljs.reader/read is safe
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1470: Bump GCL Dependency
>>> > >
>>> > > > * bump Google Closure dep
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > > > ### Fixes
>>> > >
>>> > > > * in system-time check that js/process.hrtime is actually a thing
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1228: cljs.util/topo-sort is polynomial on larger
>>> dependency graphs
>>> > >
>>> > > > * check that performance.now method actually exists
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1476: Self-host: Protocol prefixing broken for three- (or
>>> more) segment namespaces
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1472 Patch for CLJS-1467 causes regression for nodejscli
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1469 :modules regression
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1445: Syntax error for var args in protocol methods
>>> > >
>>> > > > * Warn if protocol impl methods do not match its protocol
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1451 Protocol impl do not support qualified method names
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1422: cljs.js/eval-str fails for ns form on node.js with
>>> simple optimizations
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1423: self-host: Requiring analyzer/compiler breaks
>>> unchecked Boolean
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1466: Improperly munged output path for GClosure JavaScript
>>> > >
>>> > > > * CLJS-1467: Foreign Libraries not included when using :main with
>>> :simple or :advanced
>>>
>>> --
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>>> your first post.
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "ClojureScript" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> ---
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "ClojureScript" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojurescript/AiCARjGT2Mg/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> [email protected].
>>
>>
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>
>> --
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "ClojureScript" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
>
--
Daniel
--
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
