Thomas, Thank for you reply. The hello-world.core is from "Quick start" wiki page of clojurescript on github. With explicit :static-fns :optimize-constants and :optimizations :simple, there is no significant difference. Yes, the comparison was did on hello world program and is unfair indeed, because I didn't have a real program to compare yet... The point is, dead code removal is nice for both browser and nodejs, right? It encourages modular(instead of monolithic) libraries. Whether it is worth to support is another question.
To me, the startup time and memory usage are very important. I prefer to use clojure-jvm when I need writing something down. But clojure-jvm is not suitable for utility programs(in unix style) obviously. So I need some alternatives in this area... If clojurescript+nodejs could not startup significant faster than clojure-jvm, why would I leave clojure-jvm in the first place? I'm not saying that clojurescript should support :advanced(or be suitable for utility programs). I just want to know that whether :advanced is one of the goals of clojurescript on nodejs. And I'm pretty happy with the current status: it is unlikely to got official support, but many people(projects) use it without problems. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
