That is generally my point, but in this case, the into..map is probably messing it up (is that your problem?)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Colin Yates <[email protected]> wrote: > actually no, I think I get your point. > > So are you saying that given: > > (defn child [a] > [:div {:on-change println} a]) > > (defn parent [{:keys [children other]}] > (into [:div] > (map child children))) > > that the children WON'T be re-run if 'other' changes in the map passed to > parent? > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
