On Oct 4, 2011 12:59 PM, "Max Spevack" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I know that there was work afoot to release the F16 Beta AMi on the same > day as the rest of F16 Beta. > > Is that something that is good to go? And if it's not, what was the > thing that blocked or held up the release of the Beta? The last AMI > that I can see owned by [email protected] is > 125523088429/Fedora-16-Beta-ec2-20110923-x86_64-sda -- I played around > with that AMI and while I think there were a few cloud-init issues, it > worked well enough to get the authorized_keys in the right place. > > I'd also recommend that it become part of the schedule and workflow to > update the get.fedoraproject.org page with a link to the AMI IDs, as > well as the EC2 Images wiki page itself, with those AMI IDs. Not only > for Alpha/Beta, but definitely for GA. > > Maybe even add a blurb to the release announcement when it talks about > the different ways to consume Fedora. > > To me, those are the sorts of actions that begin to put Fedora on EC2 at > a similar level to some of the other architectures, etc. > > Good think Fedora's PM and RelEng are on this list :)
And the person who writes the release announcements, right? Heh. I have no idea what the status is. Dennis mentioned the other day that the latest thing he had wasn't working (while we were in milan) - beyond that, without a ticket or etc. i have no idea. > > --Max > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
