Hey, On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 21:20 +0100, Alan Pevec wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Note that they've changed version schema on _stable_ > >> https://review.openstack.org/#change,1359 > >> so I'll have to add Epoch > > > > Hmm, why is Epoch needed? We're already using version == 2011.3 in F-16, > > isn't that the scheme they've switched to? > > I didn't find other upstream discussions about it, but looking at > comments in the above gerrit change, it looks like version is now > 0.9.1 or did I misunderstood?
Gah, confusion! It looks like ttx suggested 0.9.1 because he thought diablo keystone had been versioned as 0.9. But actually, setup.py had 1.0, the keystone.version() method returns 0.9 and git was tagged with 2011.3. I used 2011.3 as the version in Fedora after raising the issue of versioning upstream: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04946.html I've just suggested upstream use 2011.3.1 as the versioning scheme for stable branch releases. Cheers, Mark. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
