On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <[email protected]> wrote:
> ust a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were
> recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.).  You can
> ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number
> policies as well.  Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they
> change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all
> compatible.  Other times they stick with the minor number since they've
> gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development.

Hi,
I've just posted python-webobj10 which is 1.0.8.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754848

I don't seem to be able to edit the wiki page.

  Steve.




-- 
Steve Traylen
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

Reply via email to