In my opinion the reason to use sub-packages is isolated the nova services in a solution where it could be deployed in differents servers. For example: will be unnecessary to have in a nova-node (compute+network) running the nova-api together or installed. Separating, we could have a more secure environment for large deploys like Data Centers. The package could contemplate meta-packages to full nova install and node-install, for example.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 1:12 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > The packages started out with a pile of separate subpackages, each tiny. > There was little benefit seen in maintaining such separation, so the > subpackages were removed. If there's a compelling reason to split them > again, it can be reconsidered. > > -- > Matt Domsch > Technology Strategist > Dell | Office of the CTO > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [ > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Marco Sinhoreli [ > [email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 9:15 AM > To: Fedora Cloud SIG > Subject: Re: Essex EPEL Testing > > Hi David, hi all: > > Looking the openstack-nova package, I suggest to build separated packages > for api, network, compute, cert, objectstorage, scheduler, docs, > python-nova and others needed. I'm thinking in run these components in > separated machines like many others users thinking in an enterprise > environment. Like it is, is generally used for development environments. > What you think about it? I can prepare the sub-packages if you accept this > change. > > Cheers, > > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > -- Marco Sinhoreli
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
