On 09/29/2012 05:20 AM, Stephen Liu wrote: > > oVirt looks similar to OpenStack. I tried the later before. It is > also quite complex to setup
Ya I setup both for my Aeolus demo at the OLF [1] and both were on par as far as the complexity of the configuration needed. A cloud is a complicated service involving orchestrating quite a few components that may be complicated in their own right. Still think there is alot of up in the air regarding cloud computing! Got this impression from the conference as well, everyone seemed to have a different preferred IaaS implementation including the two mentioned and more > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Stephen Liu <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > >I know that some pages are obsoletes I did not use a copy paste > page, i found a lot of error but works fine on > > bare metal, ovirt is not for replacement of VirtualBox, IT is > for datacenter solutions !!!! > > > No. I'm fully aware. > > I just asked whether oVirt can run OS which runs on VM (guest) of > VirtualBox? To my understanding oVirt needs bare metal to run? > Just curious as to why we can't do this. Can't we leverage qemu if running in a vm? Will this be alleviated when kvm supports virt-in-virt? -Mo [1] http://mo.morsi.org/blog/node/372
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
