Hi, since i might be unable to join the cloud WG meeting, here are my thoughts about it:
0. no opinion, i'd favor having one portal for every products, we could follow the example of the current spins web page. For instance a landing page could show various usage of Fedora: Cloud, Server, Desktop etc... and users could click on the logo (followed by a brief description stating the goals of the product) 1. Just Enough OS for developping SaaS applications in an agile & devops fashion :). 2. developers *and* operators that develop and maintain SaaS applications (could be hosted on a cloud, virtualization server, etc...) Our target should be able to focus on their job (programming, maintaining apps and bringing values to their customers/users) 3 &4. I'd say: Amazon Linux (Amazon custom Enterprise Linux flavor), Ubuntu AMI, CentOS (which tries to be THE enterprise Linux for cloud hosting and base image), docker (albeit in a different fashion), bitnami H. 2013/11/20 Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 09:30:50AM -0500, Robyn Bergeron wrote: > > Folks: I created a ticket in our trac just so we can keep it on the > > radar for the next meeting (https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/3) - > > hopefully we can come up with some answers prior to that point and just > > use the meeting to finalize our answers. > > Once we agree on-list or during the meeting on answers, I can add to the > ticket. > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst > [email protected] | http://community.redhat.com/ > Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
