On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Mike Ruckman <[email protected]>
wrote:
* Crucial basic Docket Host Image decisions (jzb, 08:07:23)
* https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/47 (jzb, 08:07:36)
* AGREED: fedora atomic docker-specific image will not include
yum/dnf
(mattdm, 08:15:47)
OK, but with rpm-ostree I'd like to highlight that it does already link
to libhawkey and rpm, which are the same C libraries underlying dnf.
This is important preparatory work for package layering.
That said, has anyone built a list of blockers/issues they see? I have
made a good amount of progress on Anaconda, and I'm pretty confident of
delivery by next month.
* AGREED: try min-metadata-service for fedora atomic image for
alpha,
fall back to cloud-init for beta if it doesn't work out (mattdm,
08:29:56)
I'm interested in this as well, although I don't see it as so critical.
Investing in thinning down cloud-init is also likely viable.
* AGREED: aim for getting python out of the fedora atomic image too,
if all of the previous things line up. (mattdm, 08:34:36)
One issue I see here is that there are a lot of valid reasons to want
Python on the host for configuration management type tasks, and the
answer to this is to still support local package layering on top of a
base tree.
I'm relatively confident I can have basic package layering by Alpha.
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
