#44: hey we should have a vagrant base box
--------------------+---------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------+---------------------
Comment (by purpleidea):
Replying to [comment:5 walters]:
> A few issues with that script:
>
> * Disabling SELinux is obviously not something we can ship with
Agreed. I actually forgot about this... I think it was something that was
needed by vagrant boxes at some point. Easy to change this. (one-liner).
> * virt-builder is a useful tool, but rwmjones's website is not
maintained by releng. It's not going to work to bounce content to his
site and then have releng download it again
I agree! I do think it makes sense to build upon existing tools where
appropriate. This way we have fewer different initial ways to build a base
image. For the releng requirements, I'm pretty sure rwmjones tools can
point at a different repo, and even work fully "offline". You typically
need to set the /etc/virt-builder/repos.d/<something>.conf file to
whatever you want. rwmjones is probably a great resource for info on how
to build his template .xz files.
>
> Now there are two approaches.
>
> 1) Anaconda + kickstart
> I think this is probably the way to go, particularly as it would
allow us to include Vagrant-specific content.
> 2) Mutate an existing qcow2 (e.g. the cloud image)
> For the latter, see: https://github.com/cgwalters/rpm-ostree-
autocompose/commit/55af81ff04afb24429616ccb2c67b408e3a7e364 for an
approach which injects a systemd unit file, rather than attempting to
change the target from the outside. The advantage of this is that way we
pick up the SELinux policy from the target.
I actually prefer my makefile/virt-builder approach, but I obviously am
fine with other people working on different methods.
I figured I'd step up to help with this, since it was apparently a "very
long-standing request". I'm happy to continue to generate these Fedora
vagrant boxes, and I think it makes sense to use this, even "officially"
since it works _now_, and nobody for a while seemed to be doing this.
I should mention, working on this isn't really my "prime directive", so
more than I anything I was trying to be helpful so that I have beverage or
bug karma with mattdm :P
Cheers
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/44#comment:8>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
