On 02/03/2016 09:24 AM, Hannes Schmidt wrote: > > So EOL implies that no one should ever be able to launch a VM for it? > Makes no sense to me.
It's no longer receiving updates, so that does actually make sense. Can you describe the use case for an EOL release that might persuade us that we should continue paying for the storage required to host EOL AMIs and risking that users might deploy them without realizing they are no longer receiving security updates? Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS [email protected] | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
