On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Matthew Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:19:19AM -0000, [email protected] wrote: > > What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora > > VM images (AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21 is already gone even > > though it is not even two years old. Ubuntu is keeping the images > > around much longer. > > Which AMI ID are you looking for, in which regions? We had a problem > Fedora 21 for HVM in us-west-2. I can dig up the AMI ID if you'd like. Id' have to look at our past CI builds. This is how we're searching for them: https://github.com/BD2KGenomics/cgcloud/blob/a1d3d752fd05d35f8b9ce0487af4b7e156ce55d8/core/src/cgcloud/core/fedora_box.py#L30 > where we accidentally had many _unreleased_ snapshots consuming space > and costing us significant money, and recently cleaned those up. > However, all of the _released_ images back to F18 should still be > there. In US East for F21, we have ami-d2d999ba for F21 PV and > ami-acd999c4 and ami-78bafa10 for HVM. (I'm not sure offhand what the > distinction between those other two is -- I'm looking this up in the > middle of a meeting...) > > Of course, we *do* strongly recommend using the supported releases, but > we understand that it's important to have time to transition and that > sometimes old images are useful for testing, too. > > > -- > Matthew Miller > <[email protected]> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected] > -- Hannes Schmidt Software Engineer Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering University of California, Santa Cruz (206) 696-2316 (cell) [email protected]
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
