On Jul 20, 2016 5:30 PM, "Adam Miller" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Devan Goodwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > A few comments regarding openshift-ansible. I think the master branch in the repo can probably cover Fedora quite easily at least at this point in time, I don't think there's a whole lot in there that would be an issue. > > > > We're also quite well set up to deploy, manage, and upgrade containerized OpenShift deployments. (however this all uses docker today) This is only tested on RHEL and RHEL Atomic today (AFAIK) but the mechanism for doing it should already cover CentOS and Fedora Atomic variants and I suspect this would be extremely easy to get working, if it didn't just work out of the box today. > > > > We have not started down the system containers path in openshift-ansible but we very much are looking forward to that, so the work would be relevant and if the Fedora community began some of that work, I think I can safely say we'd jump at the chance to work and get it merged ASAP. > > > > Please feel free to loop me in if there are questions, I genuinely think you could be doing a lot of this very quickly with current master of openshift-ansible. > > +1 - Thanks > > This is something we're hoping to have at least a proof of concept in > working order by Flock, so the time tables are definitely near-term.
Now that is a tight deadline, but I don't see why Devan and myself couldn't help facilitate changes needed. > > -AdamM > > > _______________________________________________ > > cloud mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected] > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
