Hey! Zack Cylinder Cloudbakers Cloud Training Specialist
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:18 AM, <cloud-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Send cloud mailing list submissions to > cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists. > fedoraproject.org > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > cloud-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > cloud-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of cloud digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Fedora 25 (Benson Muite) > 2. Re: Fedora 25 (Chris Murphy) > 3. Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic compose? > compose? > (Kushal Das) > 4. [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup > (du...@dustymabe.com) > 5. Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic > compose? compose? > (Kushal Das) > 6. Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic > compose? compose? > (Dusty Mabe) > 7. Fedora 25 atomic images are stuck while booting (Kushal Das) > 8. Re: Fedora 25 atomic images are stuck while booting > (Colin Walters) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:54:15 +0300 > From: Benson Muite <benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > Subject: Fedora 25 > To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: Fedora Marketing team <market...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Message-ID: <195b12e8-187b-6bde-f2ad-8cac34212...@emailplus.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Hi, > > If any of you use Fedora Atomic as a desktop, could you add a brief > overview of why and how (workflow) you do so here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points > > For the typical Fedora workstation user, what is needed to migrate to > Fedora Atomic as a desktop? Does this make it easier to use remote cloud > resources? > > Finally please also indicate any hosting providers for which atomic is a > one click install - this seems to be of interest for some users: > https://www.digitalocean.com/community/questions/what- > about-atomic-fedora-centos-or-redhat-in-addition-to-coreos > > > Regards, > Benson > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:47:55 -0600 > From: Chris Murphy <li...@colorremedies.com> > Subject: Re: Fedora 25 > To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Cc: Fedora Marketing team <market...@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Message-ID: > <CAJCQCtRwBpbES_x6DJRQvsaZeLn_JSO-=PaLnm=PtsAYW=qEdw@mail. > gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Benson Muite <benson_mu...@emailplus.org> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > If any of you use Fedora Atomic as a desktop, could you add a brief > overview > > of why and how (workflow) you do so here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_25_talking_points > > > > For the typical Fedora workstation user, what is needed to migrate to > Fedora > > Atomic as a desktop? Does this make it easier to use remote cloud > resources? > > These might be better asked on desktop@ list where the Workstation WG > and users can put in their 2 cents? > > > -- > Chris Murphy > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:42:46 +0530 > From: Kushal Das <m...@kushaldas.in> > Subject: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic > compose? compose? > To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Message-ID: <20160905151246.GA5163@kdas-laptop> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Hi, > > After an *atomic host upgrade* in an atomic host. > > Deployments: > ● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > Version: 24.35 (2016-09-05 01:23:02) > Commit: 5832e43bcf2054a46169442557d434 > 8d38e280161955c4bcd83b19db6649a5df > OSName: fedora-atomic > GPGSignature: (unsigned) > > fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > Version: 24.39 (2016-06-15 09:57:04) > Commit: 2c7d41e8a67931fe21bc92100c59cf > f8a94c2df5a0e6a1b75957bda141601481 > OSName: fedora-atomic > GPGSignature: (unsigned) > > > Any idea anyone? > > Kushal > -- > Fedora Cloud Engineer > CPython Core Developer > https://kushaldas.in > https://dgplug.org > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 17:00:03 +0000 (UTC) > From: du...@dustymabe.com > Subject: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup > To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > Message-ID: > <20160905170003.8b75360a4...@fedocal02.phx2.fedoraproject.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2016-09-07 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC > At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net > > The meeting will be about: > Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup > > > Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 23:36:24 +0530 > From: Kushal Das <m...@kushaldas.in> > Subject: Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic > compose? compose? > To: Fedora Cloud SIG <cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Message-ID: <20160905180624.GA6840@kdas-laptop> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On 05/09/16, Kushal Das wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After an *atomic host upgrade* in an atomic host. > > > > Deployments: > > ● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > > Version: 24.35 (2016-09-05 01:23:02) > > Commit: 5832e43bcf2054a46169442557d434 > 8d38e280161955c4bcd83b19db6649a5df > > OSName: fedora-atomic > > GPGSignature: (unsigned) > > > > fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > > Version: 24.39 (2016-06-15 09:57:04) > > Commit: 2c7d41e8a67931fe21bc92100c59cf > f8a94c2df5a0e6a1b75957bda141601481 > > OSName: fedora-atomic > > GPGSignature: (unsigned) > > > Found more strange information. > > I had installed the box from [1]. But, after booting this was the host > status. > > # atomic host status > TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME > REFSPEC > * 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic > fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > > I remeber Dusty sending a related mail. But I do not remember if we > found the cause. > > [1] > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/Atomic/ > x86_64/iso/Fedora-Atomic-dvd-x86_64-24-20160820.0.iso > > Kushal > -- > Fedora Cloud Engineer > CPython Core Developer > https://kushaldas.in > https://dgplug.org > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 20:40:03 -0400 > From: Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> > Subject: Re: Why do we have an older version number for today's atomic > compose? compose? > To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > Message-ID: <6fc5ff8f-4f67-5732-0c47-93b717d7e...@dustymabe.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > > > On 09/05/2016 02:06 PM, Kushal Das wrote: > > On 05/09/16, Kushal Das wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> After an *atomic host upgrade* in an atomic host. > >> > >> Deployments: > >> ● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > >> Version: 24.35 (2016-09-05 01:23:02) > >> Commit: 5832e43bcf2054a46169442557d434 > 8d38e280161955c4bcd83b19db6649a5df > >> OSName: fedora-atomic > >> GPGSignature: (unsigned) > >> > >> fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > >> Version: 24.39 (2016-06-15 09:57:04) > >> Commit: 2c7d41e8a67931fe21bc92100c59cf > f8a94c2df5a0e6a1b75957bda141601481 > >> OSName: fedora-atomic > >> GPGSignature: (unsigned) > >> > > Found more strange information. > > > > I had installed the box from [1]. But, after booting this was the host > > status. > > > > # atomic host status > > TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME > REFSPEC > > * 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic > fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host > > > > I remeber Dusty sending a related mail. But I do not remember if we > > found the cause. > > We think we fixed it (see thread at [1]). Will you please check the > latest generated isos and see if they are fixed? > > [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists. > fedoraproject.org/thread/L4EWWWL6HEV3UHOGI2GLERA5BOOD7I43/# > E2P5FE65LOFCNLAORFTVUKK2EVBN4FML > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:29:07 +0530 > From: Kushal Das <m...@kushaldas.in> > Subject: Fedora 25 atomic images are stuck while booting > To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > Cc: rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Message-ID: <20160906065907.GA8823@kdas-laptop> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi, > > We can not ssh into the latest Fedora 25 based atomic images. While > booting one image in Openstack I got [1] as console output. > > [1] https://kushal.fedorapeople.org/f25_notbooting1.png > > Kushal > -- > Fedora Cloud Engineer > CPython Core Developer > https://kushaldas.in > https://dgplug.org > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 09:18:09 -0400 > From: Colin Walters <walt...@verbum.org> > Subject: Re: Fedora 25 atomic images are stuck while booting > To: Kushal Das <m...@kushaldas.in>, cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > Message-ID: > <1473167889.409531.717130033.75a93...@webmail.messagingengine.com> > Content-Type: text/plain > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016, at 02:59 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We can not ssh into the latest Fedora 25 based atomic images. While > > booting one image in Openstack I got [1] as console output. > > There were a few causes of this, but to level set, let's be sure that > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/ostree-2016.9-1. > fc25%20rpm-ostree-2016.7-4.fc25 > is used for the treecompose. > > One possible cause is that previous versions of rpm-ostree didn't > set up a container around dracut, and libkmod barfed on the lack > of /proc/modules, which caused no kernel modules to end up > in the initramfs. > > Now rpm-ostree consistently uses bubblewrap which fixes it > for me. > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > ------------------------------ > > End of cloud Digest, Vol 81, Issue 1 > ************************************ >
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
