On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:45:08PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Take everyone's favorite destruction test case, PostgreSQL. For > Postgres, replication doesn't necessarily work between major versions, > so once we put out a major version we need to keep it out. > > If we have a PostgreSQL-9.5.3 image on Fedora 24 Base out there, then: > > A. it's OK to replace it with a PostgreSQL-9.5.4 image on Fedora 24 > B. it's OK to replace it with a PostgreSQL-9.5.4 image on Fedora 25 > C. it's NOT OK to drop it any only have a PostgreSQL-9.6.1 image available > > I have mixed feelings about whether or not we should do (B) as policy. > In cases like this, I usually come down to: what's easier? Freezing the > base image for the major version of the application, or advancing it?
Hmmm - this seems like exactly the problem Modularity is aiming at. > One thing we can do to ameliorate that is make sure we name images after > the major version of the app and not after the patch release, i.e. the > PostgreSQL container will be > registry.fedoraproject.org/postgresql:9.5 In the modularity terminology discussion from earlier, this'd be the "stream". Or whatever equivalent term to that is chosen. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
