On 12/06/2016 04:38 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> I think we had general agreement around what we want to do here:
> have the Cloud Base Image become instead Fedora Server, but shipped
> as a cloud image and made available in cloud providers. What are the
> next steps to actually get there?


We discussed this and I believe the path forward is to have the Cloud
base image "housed" under the server WG. My understanding is that it 
will take on a similar form to what it has now until we more hammer
our what "base runtime" is and then we'll add on top of base runtime
just what we need to satisfy cloud environments.

I have been identified as a stakeholder of this image and have an
action item to deliver some paragraph that indicates such to sgallagh.

Dusty
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to