Alessandro, one other question -- can you explain the rationale for managing Hyper-V directly, as opposed to going through SCVMM? CloudStack's VMware integration goes through vCenter. We chose that model since we heard from users that VMware administrators liked using vCenter as a management point. Also, there are some features that are implemented by vCenter that a direct-host management integration could not provide without re-implementing similar functionality itself. I had assumed that a Hyper V integration would have similar issues , suggesting management via SCVMM would be advantageous, but I am relatively less familiar with Hyper-V technology and administrator preferences. Thoughts? Are there any features that we "lose" by going direct to host versus through SCVMM?
-kevin
