On 6/13/12 2:03 PM, "Lu Heng" <h...@anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>Hi
>
>As I said, I have direct attached network to the public network, and I
>have no vlan, and cloudstack force to enter a vlan ID, so I just
>entered "tagged1“.
In Advance zone Vlan is required for every direct network; and vlan has to
have numeric value. We support untagged network only in Basic zone. The
fact UI accepted "tagged1" value as an input - is a UI/API bug, it should
have never reached the backend. Please file a bug against cloudStack
UI/API.
>
>So the first question come, how can I setup direct attached network in
>advance networking, is that even possible or it is simply impossible?
Its possible only with the numeric tag.
>
>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> I see 2 different problems in this log fragment:
>>
>> 1)job-92 - i-2-415-VM failed to start because the network vlan was
>> misconfigured. The number format exception most likely indicates the
>>vlan
>> for the network was set incorrectly. Need entire log to confirm.
>>
>> 2) job-94 - failed to delete the network as i-2-413-VM was in Error
>>state
>> - it failed to start. Notice its different vm from the vm on step 1). At
>> the moment deleteNetwork was called, the vm wasnt' expunged yet. Did you
>> wait for the vm i-2-413 to be picked up by Expunge thread and moved to
>> Expunging state? If yes, was it expunged successfully? If no, you have
>>to
>> find out the references to the vm in the log - search by "to expunge"
>> pattern in the management server, it will tell you when vm was processed
>> by the expunge thread.
>>
>>
>> -Alena.
>>
>>
>> On 6/13/12 1:51 PM, "Lu Heng" <h...@anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>>The story start with I try to setup direct attached network to the
>>>guest network, in which I create a VM with the shared network I setup,
>>>but the VM does not start successfully, so I tried to delete the guest
>>>network I have created, in which I failed because of the vm was not
>>>destroy, then I try to destroy the VM, but the VM stuck in the
>>>explunging state:
>>>
>>>The network setup was not resolved, I asked in this mailling list what
>>>should I do if I have public network in the access point with advanced
>>>network setup, they said I have to create a shared network offering
>>>with Vlan, in which the public IP has no vlan setup, so I just typed
>>>tagged in the vlan section,seems not working.
>>>
>>>Below is the full story log start with I added a direct attached
>>>network:
>>>
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,401 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Catch Exception: class
>>>java.lang.NumberFormatException due to
>>>java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "tagged1"
>>>java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "tagged1"
>>> at
>>>java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.jav
>>>a:
>>>65)
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,402 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Unable to start i-2-415-VM due to
>>>java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "tagged1"
>>> at
>>>java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.jav
>>>a:
>>>65)
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,455 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Unable to clean up VBD due to
>>>You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have recently
>>>been deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference given,
>>>and the handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
>>> at
>>>com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.handleVmStartFailur
>>>e(
>>>CitrixResourceBase.java:930)
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,466 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Unable to clean up VBD due to
>>>You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have recently
>>>been deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference given,
>>>and the handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
>>> at
>>>com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.handleVmStartFailur
>>>e(
>>>CitrixResourceBase.java:930)
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,478 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Unable to clean up VBD due to
>>>You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have recently
>>>been deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference given,
>>>and the handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
>>> at
>>>com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.handleVmStartFailur
>>>e(
>>>CitrixResourceBase.java:930)
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,489 WARN [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Unable to cleanup VIF
>>>You gave an invalid object reference. The object may have recently
>>>been deleted. The class parameter gives the type of reference given,
>>>and the handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
>>> at
>>>com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.handleVmStartFailur
>>>e(
>>>CitrixResourceBase.java:938)
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,515 INFO [xen.resource.XenServer56Resource]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Catch com.xensource.xenapi.Types$VifInUse:
>>>failed to destory VLAN eth2 on host
>>>b9f6241d-cbd6-49a8-916e-dff524569dd4 due to Network has active VIFs
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,517 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Seq 6-920389063: Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId:
>>>229144658033003, via: 6, Ver: v1, Flags: 110,
>>>[{"StartAnswer":{"vm":{"id":415,"name":"i-2-415-VM","bootloader":"PyGrub
>>>",
>>>"type":"User","cpus":1,"speed":500,"minRam":536870912,"maxRam":536870912
>>>,"
>>>arch":"x86_64","os":"CentOS
>>>5.3
>>>(64-bit)","bootArgs":"","rebootOnCrash":false,"enableHA":false,"limitCpu
>>>Us
>>>e":false,"vncPassword":"7bad48a63e4b14e7","params":{},"disks":[{"id":419
>>>,"
>>>name":"ROOT-415","mountPoint":"/iqn.2006-01.com.openfiler:tsn.2912cb92f8
>>>2d
>>>/0","path":"ff3b7226-fd0b-4d0b-8af4-393496d7ee24","size":21474836480,"ty
>>>pe
>>>":"ROOT","storagePoolType":"IscsiLUN","storagePoolUuid":"f7d6960c-84a6-3
>>>32
>>>f-9068-27ef0f216b31","deviceId":0},{"id":420,"name":"DATA-415","mountPoi
>>>nt
>>>":"/iqn.2006-01.com.openfiler:tsn.2912cb92f82d/0","path":"202feab0-b724-
>>>4b
>>>70-b757-32f2b8dfddee","size":5368709120,"type":"DATADISK","storagePoolTy
>>>pe
>>>":"IscsiLUN","storagePoolUuid":"f7d6960c-84a6-332f-9068-27ef0f216b31","d
>>>ev
>>>iceId":1},{"id":415,"name":"CentOS
>>>5.6(64-bit) no GUI
>>>(XenServer)","size":0,"type":"ISO","storagePoolType":"ISO","deviceId":3}
>>>],
>>>"nics":[{"deviceId":0,"networkRateMbps":200,"defaultNic":true,"ip":"10.1
>>>.1
>>>.99","netmask":"255.255.255.0","gateway":"10.1.1.1","mac":"02:00:2e:ae:0
>>>0:
>>>04","dns1":"204.13.152.2","broadcastType":"Vlan","type":"Guest","broadca
>>>st
>>>Uri":"vlan://292","isolationUri":"vlan://292","isSecurityGroupEnabled":f
>>>al
>>>se,"name":"Pool-wide
>>>network associated with
>>>eth2"},{"deviceId":1,"networkRateMbps":200,"defaultNic":false,"ip":"46.1
>>>36
>>>.134.86","netmask":"255.255.255.0","gateway":"46.136.134.1","mac":"06:4a
>>>:b
>>>4:00:08:3d","dns1":"204.13.152.2","broadcastType":"Vlan","type":"Guest",
>>>"b
>>>roadcastUri":"vlan://tagged1","isolationUri":"vlan://tagged1","isSecurit
>>>yG
>>>roupEnabled":false,"name":"Pool-wide
>>>network associated with eth2"}]},"result":false,"details":"Unable to
>>>start i-2-415-VM due to ","wait":0}}] }
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,517 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>(DirectAgent-45:null) Cleanup failed due to Unable to start i-2-415-VM
>>>due to
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,517 WARN [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-47:job-92) Cleanup failed due to Unable to start
>>>i-2-415-VM due to
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:25,590 INFO [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-47:job-92) Unable to start VM on Host[-6-Routing] due to
>>>Unable to start i-2-415-VM due to
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:26,159 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-47:job-92) VM state transitted from :Starting to Stopped
>>>with event: OperationFailedvm's original host id: null new host id:
>>>null host id before state transition: 6
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:26,440 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-47:job-92) VM state transitted from :Stopped to Error
>>>with event: OperationFailedToErrorvm's original host id: null new host
>>>id: null host id before state transition: null
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:27,209 INFO [api.commands.DeployVMCmd]
>>>(Job-Executor-47:job-92)
>>>com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to
>>>create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-415-VM]Scope=interface
>>>com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:27,210 WARN [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
>>>(Job-Executor-47:job-92) class com.cloud.api.ServerApiException :
>>>Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-415-VM]
>>>2012-06-13 08:56:27,210 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-47:job-92) Complete async job-92, jobStatus: 2,
>>>resultCode: 530, result:
>>>com.cloud.api.response.ExceptionResponse@1660d637
>>>2012-06-13 09:11:08,903 WARN [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-50:job-94) Can't delete the network, not all user vms
>>>are expunged. Vm VM[User|i-2-413-VM] is in Error state
>>>2012-06-13 09:11:08,993 WARN [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
>>>(Job-Executor-50:job-94) class com.cloud.api.ServerApiException :
>>>Failed to delete network
>>>2012-06-13 09:11:08,993 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-50:job-94) Complete async job-94, jobStatus: 2,
>>>resultCode: 530, result:
>>>com.cloud.api.response.ExceptionResponse@2102e538
>>>2012-06-13 09:11:09,144 WARN [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-50:job-94) Unable to unregister active job 94 from JMX
>>>monitoring
>>>2012-06-13 11:26:14,160 WARN [cloud.network.NetworkManagerImpl]
>>>(Job-Executor-52:job-95) Can't delete the network, not all user vms
>>>are expunged. Vm VM[User|i-2-413-VM] is in Error state
>>>2012-06-13 11:26:14,243 WARN [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
>>>(Job-Executor-52:job-95) class com.cloud.api.ServerApiException :
>>>Failed to delete network
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>>><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> On 6/13/12 1:38 PM, "Lu Heng" <h...@anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi
>>>>>
>>>>>And btw, I didn't see the maintainace botton for the 3 shared storage,
>>>>> I only see take snapshoot, snapshoot setting, that's it.
>>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Lu Heng <h...@anytimechinese.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See my reply
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>>>>>> <alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/13/12 1:24 PM, "Lu Heng" <h...@anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I find the reason, three vm are in state of "Expunging" for 3 hours
>>>>>>>>now, no process is being made, anyone has idea what should I do
>>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>>these VMs？
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What is expunge.interval in the setup? If the vms stuck in
>>>>>>>Expunging
>>>>>>>state
>>>>>>> with null Removed field, it indicates some problem happening during
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>> expunge. I suspect it's related with the fact you removed the
>>>>>>>storage
>>>>>>>from
>>>>>>> the xen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vise verse, the situation is, the VM in the expunging state for 3
>>>>>> hours, and I find no way to delete them, so I try to delete the
>>>>>> storage.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So you deleted the VHDs per each volume, not the storage itself,
>>>>please
>>>> confirm. And we should never do it as there is no volume sync, so if
>>>>the
>>>> volume is removed on the backend, cloudStack has no idea it has
>>>>happened.
>>>>
>>>> The original issue is - vm got stuck in Expunging state. We have to
>>>>figure
>>>> out this one first. Please send the logs starting from the time the
>>>> Destroy command was executed for the Vm. And mention the vm name.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Alena.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What should I do to fix this now?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Another question is, I didn't see the delete botton with shared
>>>>>>>>storage, so I delete it from the xencenter, but after that I still
>>>>>>>>see
>>>>>>>>the deleted storage exists in the UI, what suppose to be done?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Delete storage pool consists of 2 steps:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> * enable maintenance for the shared storage
>>>>>>> * after the maintenance is completed, the Delete button will be
>>>>>>>presented
>>>>>>> to the admin; and the storage can be removed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are not supposed to delete primary storage on the backend;
>>>>>>>cloudStack
>>>>>>> has no idea if you do things like that, and it expects primary
>>>>>>>storage
>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>> be functioning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So when vm expunge happens, we see that the storage is in UP state,
>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>> try to send the destroy volume command to the Xen host. But the
>>>>>>>command
>>>>>>> fails there because there is no such primary storage exist.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let me know if its your case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Alena.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>>>>>>>><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/13/12 12:55 PM, "Lu Heng" <h...@anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Update:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>The zone has been stoped. all VM has been destoryed , the route
>>>>>>>>>>vm
>>>>>>>>>>has
>>>>>>>>>>been stoped(no option for destory).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Still get error fail to delete network.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you send management server log file for debugging.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Alena.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
>>>>>>>>>><alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/13/12 10:18 AM, "Tamas Monos" <tam...@veber.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Also I think the problem is when you are trying to delete the
>>>>>>>>>>>>network
>>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>>>router is powered off.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Therefore when you click delete it wants to remove the firewall
>>>>>>>>>>>>rules
>>>>>>>>>>>>for
>>>>>>>>>>>>that network but the router is not running so the command fails
>>>>>>>>>>>>which
>>>>>>>>>>>>fails the delet operation.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also not a problem. The rules can be removed when the router is
>>>>>>>>>>>stopped.
>>>>>>>>>>> In this case the rules are removed in DB only. When the router
>>>>>>>>>>>starts
>>>>>>>>>>>up,
>>>>>>>>>>> we start clean (cleanup all the rules) and re-apply all the
>>>>>>>>>>>rules
>>>>>>>>>>>from
>>>>>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>>>>> DB. So the removed rules won't exist on the router.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> -Alena.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Tamas Monos DDI
>>>>>>>>>>>>+44(0)2034687012
>>>>>>>>>>>>Chief Technical
>>>>>>>>>>>>Office
>>>>>>>>>>>>+44(0)2034687000
>>>>>>>>>>>>Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax
>>>>>>>>>>>>+44(0)871
>>>>>>>>>>>>522
>>>>>>>>>>>>7057
>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.veber.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost
>>>>>>>>>>>>Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>>>From: Tamas Monos [mailto:tam...@veber.co.uk]
>>>>>>>>>>>>Sent: 13 June 2012 18:15
>>>>>>>>>>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>Subject: RE: Can not delete network
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>I don't think you can delete a network if a router-vm for that
>>>>>>>>>>>>network
>>>>>>>>>>>>exists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>If you are trying to delete a network that network should not
>>>>>>>>>>>>have
>>>>>>>>>>>>any
>>>>>>>>>>>>VMs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>Delete the associated router from the management interface then
>>>>>>>>>>>>delete
>>>>>>>>>>>>the network.
>>>>>>>>>>>>This method works for me on 3.0.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Tamas Monos DDI
>>>>>>>>>>>>+44(0)2034687012
>>>>>>>>>>>>Chief Technical
>>>>>>>>>>>>Office
>>>>>>>>>>>>+44(0)2034687000
>>>>>>>>>>>>Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax
>>>>>>>>>>>>+44(0)871
>>>>>>>>>>>>522
>>>>>>>>>>>>7057
>>>>>>>>>>>>http://www.veber.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on
>>>>>>>>>>>>Facebook:
>>>>>>>>>>>>www.facebook.com/veberhost
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>>>>>From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com]
>>>>>>>>>>>>Sent: 13 June 2012 18:12
>>>>>>>>>>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>Subject: Re: Can not delete network
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Can you please check the management server log to see if there
>>>>>>>>>>>>is
>>>>>>>>>>>>more
>>>>>>>>>>>>detailed exception in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>-Alena.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>On 6/13/12 9:50 AM, "Lu Heng" <h...@anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I have problem deleting guest network, everytime I tried it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>shows "fail to delete network)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>2012-06-13 11:26:14,243 WARN [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>(Job-Executor-52:job-95) class
>>>>>>>>>>>>>com.cloud.api.ServerApiException
>>>>>>>>>>>>>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Failed to delete network
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Any idea how it happens?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Kind regards.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Lu
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>shown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>above.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination
>>>>>>>>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>intended
>>>>>>>>>>>>>addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>transmission in error, please notify this office immediately
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>e-mail
>>>>>>>>>>>>>the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>message
>>>>>>>>>>>>>and including the text of the transmission received.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>>>Kind regards.
>>>>>>>>>>Lu
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown
>>>>>>>>>>above.
>>>>>>>>>>It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>>>>>>>>otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or
>>>>>>>>>>use
>>>>>>>>>>of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>>>>>>>>>>intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>>>>>>>>>received
>>>>>>>>>>this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately
>>>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>>>e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to
>>>>>>>>>>this
>>>>>>>>>>message and including the text of the transmission received.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>--
>>>>>>>>Kind regards.
>>>>>>>>Lu
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown
>>>>>>>>above.
>>>>>>>>It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>>>>>>otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or
>>>>>>>>use
>>>>>>>>of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>>>>>>>>intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>>>>>>>>this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately
>>>>>>>>and
>>>>>>>>e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to
>>>>>>>>this
>>>>>>>>message and including the text of the transmission received.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Kind regards.
>>>>>> Lu
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown
>>>>>>above.
>>>>>> It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or
>>>>>>use
>>>>>> of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>>>>>> intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>>>>>> this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately
>>>>>>and
>>>>>> e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to
>>>>>>this
>>>>>> message and including the text of the transmission received.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>--
>>>>>Kind regards.
>>>>>Lu
>>>>>
>>>>>This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
>>>>>It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>>>otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
>>>>>of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>>>>>intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>>>>>this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and
>>>>>e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
>>>>>message and including the text of the transmission received.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>--
>>>Kind regards.
>>>Lu
>>>
>>>This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
>>>It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
>>>of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>>>intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>>>this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and
>>>e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
>>>message and including the text of the transmission received.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>--
>--
>Kind regards.
>Lu
>
>This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
>It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
>of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and
>e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
>message and including the text of the transmission received.
>
