This may be safe to nuke. We don't actually run the xe-tools since it complicates the hypervisor upgrade. Anthony can comment more on this.
On 7/20/12 12:11 PM, "Mohammad Nour El-Din" <nour.moham...@gmail.com> wrote: >If no one can remember, can we use the dates and look up thr code in Xen >related codebase and see what license is it ? >If u can give me hints were to look I can do that. > >Sent from my Samdung Galaxy S3 >Apologies for any typos >On Jul 20, 2012 8:20 PM, "David Nalley" <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >> >> Hi folks: >> >> I was working on license headers today and came across some stuff in >> patches/systemvm/debian. >> >> The xe directory contains a number of xe tools, and when I run git log >> I get the following: >> >> >> commit 2f634c09137ae756af6b46ef3cd61eae9d5b57ac >> Author: frank <frank.zh...@citrix.com> >> Date: Tue Apr 3 04:50:05 2012 -0700 >> >> Switch to Apache license >> >> commit ccd39e88f6450cef41a21ac38201efb8e658ecf7 >> Author: Chiradeep Vittal <chirad...@cloud.com> >> Date: Thu Oct 21 11:31:24 2010 -0700 >> >> add xs-tools scripts >> >> >> xs-tools comes from upstream Xen I presume - and I am guessing that we >> can't just blindly switch the license as we did on 4/3 - so my >> questions are: >> >> 1. Did this code come from xs-tools >> 2. If 1 is true, what was the license under which they were originally >licensed? >> 3. Have we modified these tools at all? >> 4. Are we going to try and convince upstream to relicense for us >> (assuming it is a prohibited license), or???