Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 26, 2012, at 7:23 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
>>> The following combination should work:
>>> 1. one devcloud VM has one NAT nic + one host-only nic
>>> 2. another one devcloud VM has one host-only nic, which uses the same
>>> host-only network as above devcloud.
>>> 
>>> The first devcloud VM acts as both mgt server and xen host, the second
>>> one just as a xen host.
>>> The changes need to make in both VMs:
>>> In first devcloud VM, put xenbr0 on eth1(I assume it's the host-only
>>> network), instead of eth0.
>> 
>> One more thing...: Need to join both vm1 and vm2 into a cluster with "xe 
>> pool-join"
>> I'll have a try by myself at first, then give you a detailed instruction.
> 
> Thanks, looking forward to your solution.
> 
> I tried to do that, for some reason it failed to work for me. So, as a proof 
> of concept I made a setup from scratch in which my development env and mgmt 
> server/db is on host os and the hypervisor runs separately on VBox. This kind 
> of setup may be preferable than a monolithic one?
> 
> Just want to share my approach and problems I have with it. The setup:
> 
> Two separate default citrix xenserver 6.0.2 (2GB RAM each) running inside 
> VBox, one ubuntu linux vm (512MB RAM) to serve as NFS secondary storage, 
> 'use.local.storage' and 'system.vm.local.storage' set to true in cloudstack's 
> global settings. Only host-only network 192.168.0.x/vboxnet0, one NIC on each 
> VMs, is used.
> 
> My development environment and mgmt server/mysql runs on my host os, mac osx 
> 10.7.4/8GB RAM using latest apache-cloudstack-git. In this setup, after 
> setting up my CS mgmt server I'm able to configure a basic zone with basic 
> shared network, using the same IP values as given on wiki, replacing 10.0.2.x 
> with 192.168.0.x.
> 
> The setup seems to work and the system vms get deployed on one of the 
> xenserver vm, but the SSVM fails to work. I ssh into the SSVM using it's 
> link-local IP via its host xenserver's dom0, and find that the SSVM is unable 
> to reach the gateway, 192.168.0.1. All routes, iptables look fine, comments?

Which bridge is used by the system vm ?
"brctl show" on each of your hyper visor  vm
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav

Reply via email to