Hi... Will not be able to have a times that suits all, try to get a time that suits most of people for that time and they can attend next time, taking into account having ASF rules when it comes to off the mailing list communications.
An idea I would like to propose is to have a certain list of topics (agenda) for a specific IRC meeting so different people can evaluate whether they should/shoudn't attend that meeting and hence you get only the people interested and less people means agreeing on time easier I believe. On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier <j...@zonker.net> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 04:21 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >> The reason I'm opting for 21:00 UTC is that it's after dinner. > > That's totally reasonable... but 21:00 UTC is 17:00 for folks on Eastern > time in the U.S., which is usually the end of the work day for folks who > actually clock out at 5. (Actually, it's 17:00 part of the year, 16:00 > part of the year since UTC is constant but you have daylight savings to > figure in for many timezones.) > >> I'd not rotate times, as that will confuse people. > > I agree with this - but if we go with a single time, it's going to be > inconvenient for someone all of the time. So in that case, I guess we're > going to be stuck with deciding who gets stuck with an inconvenient time > all the time. > -- > Joe Brockmeier > j...@zonker.net > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
