6825 - It is a part fix, looks like it only cleans basic network. My take is to
ship it and fix the advance network in a subsequent checkin.
I will submit the advanced network fix this week or early next week.
6895 - There are minor changes to uploaded diff I will send an updated diff
today.
6899 - is reviewed, can someone commit?
> There is still an outstanding issue that the Autoscale API should not refer to
> snmp counters but should use key value pairs instead
I have done changes for this, I will send a patch by tomorrow for review.
Thanks,
Vijay V.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 2:16 AM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: List of New Features in 4.0
>
> There are this set of reviews:
> 6825, 6895, 6899 already open?
>
> There is still an outstanding issue that the Autoscale API should not refer to
> snmp counters but should use key value pairs instead. This has not been
> addressed.
> http://markmail.org/message/74sw3efn3mupfqc2
>
> http://markmail.org/thread/nb262oyznlnkigkb
>
>
>
> On 9/10/12 12:03 PM, "Vijay Venkatachalam"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Ok thanks, so if I understand this right, I will be sending the patches
> >for review with the changes to source code but without the appropriate
> >jar files.
> >
> >For AutoScale branch, user downloads the right jar files to deps folder
> >and he can build.
> >For master, user still download to deps folder and runs
> >install-non-oss.sh (I can see the netscaler jar file entries already
> >present).
> >
> >I will upload the necessary jar files (for master and autoscale branch)
> >tomorrow to a public location and send out a separate mail.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Vijay V.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 12:02 AM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: List of New Features in 4.0
> >>
> >> Moved to the dev list:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > For Autoscale feature, the re-licensing of NetScaler SDK Jar is
> >> > held up in the Citrix legal :-( , and meanwhile, can I send patches
> >> > with
> >>the latest
> >> NetScaler jar files (still without the new license) to the autoscale
> >>branch alone (not master)? We have about 10 pending patches waiting
> >>for inclusion.
> >>
> >> There are 2 issues with that.
> >>
> >> First, we are moving ALL jar / mar / war files out of the code repo,
> >>so please don't try to put one back in (even on a branch).
> >>
> >> The second issue is that we should not be moving backwards on the
> >>state of our licensing compliance. If the NetScaler jar is still a
> >>non-Apache 2 compatible license (per ASF standards on this), then it
> >>needs to be thought of as an optional build target. We need to be
> >>able have an optional build flag to include it after the user
> >>downloads the file manually somehow (probably the same way we do
> >>others like this: install-non-oss.sh ).
> >>
> >> -chip
> >>
> >> > I haven't checked the 4.0 code, but it seems that all NetScaler
> >>support is
> >> removed from 4.0 master (besides autoscale), Am I right here? Is this
> >>pending the NetScaler SDK jar re-licensing?
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Vijay V.
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:[email protected]]
> >> >> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 10:53 PM
> >> >> To: CloudStack Users
> >> >> Subject: Re: List of New Features in 4.0
> >> >>
> >> >> Autoscaling is still pending a merge and is unlikely to make it
> >> >> into
> >>4.0.
> >> >>
> >> >> On 9/10/12 9:49 AM, "Shanker Balan" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >On 10-Sep-2012, at 8:10 PM, James Jeffrey
> >> >> ><[email protected]>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Hello,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Sorry if it already exists - I've looked but failed to find. Is
> >> >> >>there a list of new features in 4.0 please?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >AFAIK, the 2 significant features are VPC and autoscaling. Maybe
> >> >> >the release manager(s) can comment further.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Hth
> >> >> >@shankerbalan
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
