On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:55 AM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Chip Childers > <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: >>>> Saying that configuration files, in all cases, are not copywritable because >>>> that are, on the whole, not as complex as code is like saying that blog >>>> posts, in all cases, are not copywritable because they are, on the whole, >>>> not as complex as books. >>>> >>>> The law is much more nuanced than that. There is no way we can say, up >>>> front, whether a configuration file is protected by copywrite or not. The >>>> unwillingness to commit to anything on legal-discuss is an indication of >>>> this. (It was made explicit that with a vague question, there will only be >>>> vague answers.) >>>> >>>> It might be better to actually document what we have, and then present that >>>> to legal discuss and take it from there. >>>> >>>> Let's get concrete. >>>> >>>> We should put together a list of each config file path, along with >>>> information such as: >>>> >>>> * Size of file >>>> * Complexity (key/value, code snippets, what?) >>>> * Copyright notice or license header? >>>> * License of project it (may) have been taken from >>>> * Origin (Citrix, upstream project, unknown?) >>>> >>>> Once we have a complete picture, I think we can talk about how to proceed. >>>> >>>> (And hopefully propose a guideline for future config files.) >>>> >>>> I certainly do not think we are in a position to write of an entire >>>> category of data as being uncopywritable. >>>> >>>> I am happy to run this to pursue this with legal too, but I think we need a >>>> better view of what we're dealing with. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> >>> >>> >>> Alright, I'll start working on compiling this. >>> >>> --David >>> >> >> David, >> >> Do you want to divide and conquer on this task? I'd be happy to help. >> >> -chip > > > Happy to have the help > --David >
David, I've gotten as far as I can with the list (via the google spreadsheet you shared). I think the next step is to send it out for broader review. We are going to need the help of the folks that might have originally added the config file / script to the project. -chip