> On Sept. 27, 2012, 12:34 a.m., edison su wrote:
> > plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/BridgeVifDriver.java,
> >  line 132
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/7165/diff/2/?file=158452#file158452line132>
> >
> >     Sorry for the late about reviewing your code. 
> >     I think here it's better to subclass BridgeVifDriver, as normal linux 
> > bridge doesn't this special handling.
> >     For example, you can put all your modification on BridgeVifDriver into 
> > a new class called ovsVifDriver, override plug and unplug, then in 
> > agent.properties file, add libvirt.vif.driver=ovsVifDriver.

While playing the code, I found that current LibvirtComputingResource has tons 
of code that depends on linux bridge and vlan config, so I could not think 
about a sensible ovs libvirt.vif.driver now. I would discard this patch for now.


- Hiroaki


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7165/#review11960
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 19, 2012, 11:30 a.m., Hiroaki Kawai wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7165/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 19, 2012, 11:30 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Adds STT support on KVM host, just like in XenServer. The host os having 
> openvswitch and brcompat kernel module will plug the VM to openvswitch port 
> through general brctl interface calls.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/BridgeVifDriver.java
>  cf4de09 
>   scripts/vm/network/vnet/setupLswitch.sh PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/HypervisorGuruBase.java 242852f 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7165/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hiroaki Kawai
> 
>

Reply via email to