Yes Chip. Will update forum shortly -----Original Message----- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 1:53 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] Status (Oct 9) of starting a 4.0.0 vote
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Will Chan <will.c...@citrix.com> wrote: > From this list, it looks like we have two blockers left. > > 1. Adding deb package for AWSAPI. Edison said he'll look into this and QA > for this should be pretty simple. I see that Edison has committed the DEB files, and the build is working properly on jenkins.cs.o. QA team - have you started testing the AWSAPI code on Ubuntu? > 2. CLOUDSTACK-301. This is the Cisco Nexus vSwitch support that CloudPlatform > recently GAed in our 3.0.5 release (Burbank). It look like with the recent > changes to the plugin framework, the porting of the feature was not done > well. The time to fix this and to QA it properly could be in the order of > days or perhaps a week. I would hate to delay the release of CloudStack > anymore due to this one feature. What does the community think? Do you > think we should drop this and release 4.0? I believe we have a couple of > other features that are in similar situations (i.e. Netscalar autoscaling, > but I could be wrong). > > Will > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 6:36 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: [ASFCS40] Status (Oct 9) of starting a 4.0.0 vote >> >> Hi all, >> >> Lots of things are happening right now around 4.0.0, so we're still >> not ready to VOTE. >> >> Here's a summary of the outstanding issues (as I see them): >> >> * AWASPI was integrated to quickly, and some things were missed. The >> thread Wido started on it's appropriateness needs to come to >> consensus. If it does stay, it needs the DEB packaging to be >> completed and tested (CLOUDSTACK-294). Wido is willing to do the >> packaging after consensus is reached. >> >> * CLOUDSTACK-301 is a blocker as well - That one looks like there is >> missing code? Devdeep Singh is the assigned community member. >> >> * CLOUDSTACK-156 is a blocker that was reopened. Rohit, can you work >> with the test team to get it resolved / closed? >> >> * CLOUDSTACK-298 is set as Critical. Can someone triage that bug and >> make a recommendation as to the severity and timing of a fix? It's >> currently unassigned. >> >> * The release notes need to be pulled in from >> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7498/ I'll take responsibility for >> doing that today. >> >> * We didn't pull the internationalization resources into 4.0 (they >> were committed to master last night by David). I'd suggest we hold >> of on putting them in the 4.0 branch, but that we use master to build >> the project's documentation site. >> >> That's all I have on my list right now. Shout if there are any other >> issues, and PLEASE get involved in reaching conclusions to the issues noted >> above. >> >> -chip >
