On 10-Oct-2012, at 12:59 PM, Edison Su <[email protected]> wrote:

> I checked all the distributions we supported, all have javassit packages. 
> What's the point to add that jar into dep rpm?

Let's follow what David suggested, we're in code freeze now, so let's not 
breakout from existing workflows.

To answer your question:
What's the point of adding axis, commons-*,  and other packages which are also 
supported on all distros?

This is certainly up for discussion, but let's do that only post 4.0.

Regards.

> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Oct 10, 2012, at 12:26 AM, "Rohit Yadav" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 10-Oct-2012, at 12:22 PM, Edison Su <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Don't add javassit jar into deps rpm! It breaks rpm build.
>>> Javassit is a dependence, included in  centos 6.3. Again, if it's not in 
>>> RHEL Iso, need to turn on RHN.
>> 
>> Check again all your commits. javassist is an apache license compliant 
>> package that is fetched by maven.
>> We've a lot of packages that may be on one distro but not on other, hence 
>> we're bundling them in cloud-deps package.
>> 
>> We can have a discussion on adding suffix cloud- on them to avoid possible 
>> install conflicts, but only post 4.0
>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:03 PM, "Rohit Yadav" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 10-Oct-2012, at 11:24 AM, Rohit Yadav <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> I'm maintaining the nonoss build patch which fails for the commit 
>>>>> c49f3beccfcd1257eca1ea06606fb55b3fdf5093 which removes javassist jar from 
>>>>> cloud-deps.
>>>>> For this one has to either configure a CentOS repo and the dependency 
>>>>> will get downloaded, or install javassist manually.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But this applies for a lot of other packages that may be downloaded from 
>>>>> a distro's repo such as axis, axiom etc. then cloud-deps may not have any 
>>>>> use.
>>>>> Since we're in code freeze now, I'm reverting let's do this discussion 
>>>>> post 4.0 and make any such changes.
>>>> 
>>>> I followed the commits, with triple reverts, I held my revert back :( I'll 
>>>> ask QA to just install javassist manually now, since you would know better 
>>>> what you did around that, pl. see this issue.
>>>> 
>>>> Regards.
>> 

Reply via email to