Noah - Agree with you. I think whosoever is voting +1 should explicitly indicate the extent to which they have tested it as well.
-----Original Message----- From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@tumbolia.org] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 2:35 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, first round Chip, Thanks for calling the vote! I'll take a look later. :D Just one quick note. We might want to include a step in the testing procedure that asks people to state on the list that they followed the tests, and that they were successful. I have found in the past that people are often happy to +1 a release without testing it, which defeats the purpose of the vote. Asking for an explicit acknowledgement increases testing. If there's anyone reading this who already voted +1, indicating how far through the test procedure you got would be handy! On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Chip Childers (ASF) < chipchild...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release > 4.0.0-incubating. > > Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+4.0+ > test+procedure > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > artifacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so please > give it a shot! > > > The following artifacts are up for the vote: > > http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/releases/4.0.0- > incubating/ > > PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58): > http://people.apache.org/~chipchilders/dist/cloudstack/KEYS > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=s > hortlog;h=refs/heads/4.0 > Commit: 5ee613fbf2da5f6212f2f166c980506e0c6cb5cb > > List of changes: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloudstack.git;a=b > lob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=refs/heads/4.0 > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PPMC and IPMC members please be > sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Thanks! > > -chip > -- NS
