> -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 2:03 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] Getting to the next VOTE round... > > I just closed CLOUDSTACK-326 > > David is looking at CLOUDSTACK-329 > > I'm hopefully someone will resolve CLOUDSTACK-325, but I'm not sure if > anyone is working on it. I'm not going to wait for this one though.
CLOUDSTACK-325 is fixed: commit 4903535959f844865a602469247a61e2d5dd9fb9 on 4.0 branch, only one line change, don't need to retest. > > If David clears 329 before I check back in tonight, I'm going to cut > another RC tonight and start round 2 voting. Otherwise, I'll probably > have to wait until either another evening this weekend, or on Monday. > > -chip > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Will Chan <will.c...@citrix.com> wrote: > > Chip, > > > > I assume the two outstanding issues are being looked at by someone? > > > > Will > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > >> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 1:21 PM > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [ASFCS40] Getting to the next VOTE round... > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Chip Childers > >> <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > >> > Hi all, > >> > > >> > Great progress today in getting closer to another round of voting > for > >> > 4.0.0-incubating! > >> > > >> > AFAIK, CLOUDSTACK-326 (README, NOTICE and LICENSE file issues) is > the > >> > outstanding *required* fix. > >> > > >> > There is talk of correcting CLOUDSTACK-325 ("AWS API - Port 7080 > is > >> > not opened by default..."), but it needs to be corrected in master. > >> > I'm not going to hold up the release candidate build for this fix > >> > though. > >> > > >> > As soon as we're able to come to a conclusion, I'll do another > build > >> > and start the VOTE again. > >> > > >> > Thanks all! > >> > > >> > -chip > >> > >> One additional issue: CLOUDSTACK-329 "Can't create rpms/debs from > >> source tarball" > >> > >> That one also needs to be resolved. > >
