A small item I noticed is that the "Contributing to Apache CloudStack as a Non-Committer" page actually has this link.
http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/develop/non-contributors.html It says non-contributors instead of non-committers or may be it should say contributors. --Alex > -----Original Message----- > From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 3:25 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Feedback on site redesign > > The site looks nice. One comment I have and it's the same I had on > cloudstack-meeting irc. > > We should keep a top-level link that points the user to the features and > progress of the next release. We had plenty of questions during 4.0 from > users about the progress of the release and the features in it. > > The page probably should exists in our wiki but that link and some general > information about the timing of the release deserves top billing. > > --Alex > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 6:21 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Feedback on site redesign > > Thanks Charles! We actually are using the CMS for the main site. > > IMO the site should primarily act as a place for users and non-contributing > developers (perhaps users of the API). The Wiki should be the home of > development documentation for those that want to contribute to, hack in, > work on the project. > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Charles Moulliard <ch0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > To maintain the content we could use Apache CMS ( > > http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html) as we do for Apache DeltaSpike > and > > OpenEJB projects. Content (mardown pages) can be edited from within > > the browser directly or using svn. > > Another possibility is to use like we do for Apache Camel, Karaf & > > ServiceMix Scalate (= templating engine - > > http://scalate.fusesource.org/) to generate site contain + manual. I can > provide you more info if required. > > In both cases, we could easily move content from Wiki. > > > > Regards, > > > > Charles > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Sheng Liang <sheng.li...@citrix.com> > wrote: > > > >> >About the links on the side... I appreciate them. The wiki is in > >> >need of TLC, and until we get the ok for themes and content > >> >templates, the wiki is not the first place people will go for info. > >> > >> I agree the wiki is in need of TLC, but it still has the most > >> accurate information and the most up-to-date content because it is > >> easy for developers to contribute. So while we make wiki look better, > >> we have to continue to direct developers to wiki. Form should follow > function. > >> > >> Sheng > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Charles Moulliard > > Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat) Twitter : > > @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
